|
|
|
I've said it (and you've read it) many times before, I am a political animal. More often than not in the last 15 years I have looked to a voice that is now sadly, suddenly silenced to form, or confirm, my opinions.
My kids, mates, friends all knew we didn't go to breakfast on Sunday before MEET THE PRESS was over. Between 8 and 9 on Sunday morning you didn't call me, and if you did, I didn't answer. Even more than the network [NBC] who's Washington Bureau he guided (some say built), these last few years his imprint on MSNBC has made it my constant background, in office and home.
To have the combination of insight and brass balls to build a network that counted among it's personalities a range from Pat Buchanan to Keith Olbermann was simply genius. And all to a Springsteen soundtrack. Imagine... The last 18 hours or so, I have been as tearfully transfixed by his co-worker's coverage [flipping between NBC and MSNBC], as I always was, gleefully, by his contributions to both channels. Again, I am a political animal, and the word of Tim Russert was my manna.
But to really understand the love and absolute respect he engendered, one need only look at the interview Matt Lauer did this morning with VP Cheney. For the last 8 years he's been in the public eye, Mr. Cheney has [quite rightfully] always been seen as the leader of the evil empire; Darth Vader incarnate. Yet he's never seemed more human, more touched by anything, than he obviously was by Tim's passing.
I don't know how we, as a country, will get through this election cycle without his wit and wisdom. I am not especially religious, but it's said God takes the good ones early to help him. Tim is at his side. |
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that the massive ego that drove Bubba into the White House wasn't his alone. His wife surely has it also, and that's not necessarily a negative criticism.
On Wednesday I asked Hillary to go away. I may have been a bit hasty. Her very unflattering non-concession speech of Tuesday night infuriated me, and many, many others. It was the epitome of sorelosership; quintessential nyah nyah nyah, led off by Terry McAuliff's ridiculously antagonistic introduction of "the next President of the United States".
But I've just watched as Mrs. Clinton delivered a very strong, clear endorsement of our true next president, Barack Obama. The speech was really a few speeches, and therefore all over the map. Yes, it was overly self-congratualtory. Yes, it had an awful lot of "me" in it. And yes, she even found a way to laud Bubba's reign in it. But she somehow found a way of using that inimitably ego-centric view (so unique to politicians named Clinton) to clearly, emphatically, and convincingly lead her followers to Mr. Obama.
When she used his campaign slogan "Yes We Can" she did so in a way that left no doubt she believed it. When she beseeched her followers to pray for his success, she clearly included herself in that congregation.
So, okay, don't go away just yet, Mrs. Clinton. In fact, if you (and, hopefully, Bubba) can maintain this attitude and be this supportive and work this hard to secure Barack's eventual win, don't go away at all. Take your rightful place as a leader of our party, and our country, with pride.
In fact, take your place as his running mate. If, again, you can show us that the attitude of this speech was REALLY your attitude, you've earned, and deserve, it and I, for one, will support it.
(A slight P.S. - If not the Veep, Mrs. C, I pray I see you in a robe on the bench of The Supreme Court. I cannot think of anyone more able, and suited, for it, and almost hope to see you there more than as second banana. It's a much longer, much, much more impressive tenure. You deserve it). |
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs. Clinton, Ok, now go away.
At the beginning I couldn't have been a more avid supporter. With 2 daughters (and a son) I was practically drooling at the thought of such a groundbreaking run for, and win of, the presidency by someone I believed to be the most competent, able person on the scene. That you're a woman was just gravy...
BUT Mrs. Clinton, you blew it so many times in so many ways I can no longer even support you for VP, and I truly believe that you achieved the exact opposite of what you thought you were setting out to do. I believe you've now singlehandedly set the Women's Movement back a millenium, no mean feat.
You've proven yourself to be a truth-stretcher (if not an outright liar), and you and your husband (who until now has been my political idol) have proven to be just another pair of disgusting, filthy-fighting DC insiders who will stop at NOTHING to win what is not yours. Under fire in Bosnia? More people voted for you than anyone in primary history? It took the comic Sinbad (for God's sake) to blow the first lie, and your run in Michigan, in spite of an agreement NOT to run there, to validate the second. And those are just 2 of the myriad disgusting things you both have done, worst of which is the gender AND race baiting. Jeeeezzzz.
The absolute final straw was what I consider to be the single most UNgracious, UNflattering, NONconcession speech you delivered last night. In the face of Mr. Obama's CLEAR win, you had one final chance to step up, and you clearly blew it.
GET SOME CLASS, MRS. CLINTON. Go back to carpetbagging in NY, and stay out of National politics. The country will be better served by your disappearance from the scene, and we will all enjoy the fruits of Mr. Obama's presidency far more without you being the big ugly worm in the apple.
A former supporter,
The Spielster |
|
|
|
|
|
Well, will modern wonders never cease? A company that gave a shit, worked hard, and fixed something... How outre. How absolutely not 2007ish. And not done from a call center in India...actually done right here in California, in the good ol' US of A!!!
A few months back, I wrote, and uploaded, a bunch of posts. Hell, I even really liked some of 'em!! They dealt with my break-up from what's-her-name (the very unfunny famous comedy writer), the preponderance of psych-meds and their affect on society and me directly, the decline of Civility, and one of my usual "What-the-fuck-GW?" rants. The notifications to subscribers (and thanks to those who are - how affirming) during that 10 day period didn't go out. Shoulda been my first warning. Then, within a week, GoDaddy (who hosts this blog) ate them. Like my dog used to do to my homework. Only, I really did the posts!! Naive, trusting blogger that I am, though, I did them within the blog program and didn't save them externally. Won't do that again...
I posted a brief indictment rant, and asked for suggestions for a new host. Someone from GoDaddy was reading (!) and contacted me.
He was honest. He admitted they'd had a few small "blips" on one of their servers. Didn't affect many people, but (my luck, of course) did affect The Spiel. He offered to look into it, work to fix it, (and thus keep my business), and even give me some credit. Three weeks ago, I got the all-fixed all-clear-to-resume-posting. But I've been crazy busy (good), so this is my first chance to post.
In fact, I'm now so happy with GoDaddy, i've moved all my web business over to them, and they're doing just fine. I'm building a new website for Hassman Entertainment. Then I'll get to CharActorsInc.Com and 28DaysToHealth.Com, the two other websites I'm really passionate about.
And there's been a lot of personal and professional changes in the last few months, and I'm anxious to let you all know about them. A new business associate, lots of time with my son, a few great showsmoviesplays, new clients, old clients, breathing in, breathing out.... I'm reinvigorated all around (though a lovelife would be nice...).
So, unlike those other times I made you promises, I'm now confident if you keep checking in frequently you'll have a lot more reasons to love me, hate me, laugh at and with me, and (my fave) feel my rant!
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, did you miss me? I missed me enough for us all, so don't worry if you didn't. After the publicity fiasco, which (don't get me wrong) had it's upside, life got weird. Being recognised is NOT what I got in this for, and I was. A lot. It made me very uncomfortable in a creepy, why-do-you-watch-those-shows kind of way. And people ask the strangest, boldest questions, especially those folks who don't know me, or him. I guess they figure they've got nothing to lose...they'll never encounter me again and this is their shot. "Did he really do it?", "How does it feel to lie publicly for someone else?", and even (a lot) "Why didn't he just plug the bastard and be done with him?". That last one always made me laugh. It said more about the questioner than anything else. It was his son, for God's sake.
But during my hiatus from me, from reality, a lot has happened in the world-at-large that I want to address. And I will, here. I've got about 12 posts almost ready and will begin putting them up this weekend. As you can imagine, a great many of them have to do with Bozo The Prez. He just continues to amaze me. And would amuse me too if he wasn't inflicting so much pain with his lunacy. But there's other stuff, too, including the impending writer's strike, my split from what's-her-name, the incredible permeation of psych-meds into our society, the state of the entertainment biz, network news, the success and failure of Spiderman 3, and much more.
So stay tuned, kids. I'm building to some incredible rants, and a couple of raves. (It is, after all, so much more fun to rant). They'll be here. Soon. Check in. |
|
|
|
|
|
There’s a certain comfort in anonymity; an easy grace in operating from behind a curtain. I’ve spent my 25+ years as manager for some pretty well known, amazingly talented folks, representing them from behind that shield. That came to a screeching halt this past week.
One of my really famous clients, who’s also a friend, got in a very highly publicized altercation involving two of his sons and himself. There was a surreal frenzy surrounding the incident, and since I really like this man, I figured the right thing to do was, for the first time in my career, come out of my comfort zone to defend him against the ridiculous allegations being leveled against him, not only by the sometimes-scummy press, but his elder son, who is a real piece of work.
So first, Sunday around noon I issued a statement on his behalf. And we actually thought that might slake the thirst for inside info on celebrities lives, and things would die down and go away. Silly us. Between last Sunday morning and yesterday, when very sadly another (in)famous celebrity died and took the glare off us, I fielded well over a thousand calls and emails, was quoted and misquoted ad nauseum in more media outlets than I can count, and actually went on camera for the first time in my career. And it was freaky.
Did you know about editing? It seems no matter what you tell them, they’ll make you say what they want. Even the good ones do it. First I did an interview for the LA Times, a relatively prestigious publication. I gave my comments on the record, but wound up being reduced to “a source close to the situation”. HEY. I have a name, damn it. And missed Prince’s halftime show to give you that statement, fucker. Then the very famous, and famously tawdry, “Page 6” from the NY Post. But, oddly, they were very nice to my client, used my name, and even spelled it right! The rest of Sunday was spent fielding 292 emails and numerous calls from news outlets ranging from the Associated Press to The Shanghai News to (I swear) The PCH Press to Good Morning America, The Today Show, and countless local LA stations. (I didn’t know there were so many….). Hell, I even got an email from Dr. Phil, who offered to have all involved parties on his show to settle the mess and heal the wounds. Big man, bigger ego. I lost count of how many statements/”interviews” I gave. I headed to my girlfriend’s house to try for some normalcy (hahaha), forgetting momentarily that my cell phone was in my pocket, and I had email access at her house, too.
Then, literally at daybreak Monday, things really picked up steam. (The phone calls alone Monday passed the 350 mark). The most tenacious among them were TMZ.Com, (a site I’ve grown to love because Harvey Levin, a lawyer and former legal reporter I’ve always admired, runs it, along with a terrific woman, Gillian Sheldon, and they “vet” information better than anyone, and are accurate to the point of gospel), and Good Morning America. I gave statements and confirmed info for TMZ numerous times Monday, and they always got, and printed, it right. Can’t say that for all the other outlets I spoke to, and there were a lot, but with that renewed belief TMZ gave me that the press could get it right, and my beautiful Leah’s urging, I agreed to an on camera interview with GMA. On one condition: they didn’t show up until after we’d watched “24”!! (Gotta have some sanity in my life, even if it is only straining to hear Jack Bauer’s whispered words…..) Sure as shit, they agreed and showed up at her house at 10:30 pm to tape the piece for Tuesday morning. The crew was really nice and unobtrusive, and I know (‘cause my honey told me so) for my very first on-camera interview, I did my client, and myself, proud.
But you’ll never see it, or know how they cut me up, because Tuesday morning I awoke at 5 am to find another ridiculous amount of emails and phone messages, among them one from GMA telling me we’d been bumped by the breaking astronaut-in-a-diaper-love-triangle story!! So much for my first shot at this. But Leah convinced me, since my “cherry” was already popped, to pick a few others and get as much of the truth out there as I could. She’s a good one, and smart as hell, so of course I took her advice.
Next on Tuesday morning, I agreed to do “Entertainment Tonight”, only, as it turns out, ET is really only half of an hour block of “infotainment”, (a word I’ve quickly grown to hate), and I wound up on The Insider, too. These pieces were overseen by an amazing woman named Bonnie Tiegel. How she took 45 minutes of taped Q and A, cut them down to about 3 seconds on each show, and maintained the gist of what I said quite accurately is beyond me, but she did. And I was grateful, and pumped enough to keep talking….that is until a very famous media-whore-attorney held a press conference mid-morning to say absolutely nothing on behalf of the idiot son and his girlfriend. Followed in short order by my client’s attorney, Mark Werksman’s news conference at which he stated a lot, and refuted the insinuations made at the earlier dog-and-pony show. The rest of Tuesday and Wednesday we closed ranks and kept quiet.
Thursday was Jerry Penicoli on Extra. He was very nice and did a really good piece, coordinated by his assignment editor, also a really nice guy, Christopher Liss, who pursued me relentlessly. I’m glad I gave in to him. Then came the absolute nicest among the lot, Jim Moret, the lawyer/entertainment reporter for Inside Edition. Jim dug deep for truth, but did it incredibly warmly, and respectfully. Not at all what I expected. His piece got bumped Thursday night by the celebrity death story, but it’ll run on their “Weekend Edition” show this weekend. I’m a bit anxious, but looking forward to it nonetheless. My client deserves what I hope will be, from me anyway, this last shot at getting the real story out.
I won’t bore you (or myself) with too many more details, but I will tell you this: I have a newfound respect and admiration for those PR folks who specialize in “damage control”. It’s a thankless, tedious job with huge risks. Most of the rest of the press I did, on camera and off, was edited to suit the particular outlet’s style. Some of the other papers, radio and TV outlets weren’t so nice so I won’t even dignify them by printing their names. But I guess that’s what their audiences demand, and they sure pile it on for them. So be it.
Finally, personally, I reconfirmed something I already knew. For 5 days, my gf, Leah, propped me up, urged me on, fed me, comforted and supported me, and kept me going when I thought I couldn’t. But mostly she put up with what can only be described as MY utterly insane week. And did it selflessly with the kind of wit, grace, and love I don’t think I could have. Lucky for my client….luckier for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've said it many times, here and elsewhere: Countdown with Keith Olbermann is reason enough to own a television. Of late he's been making enormous inroads into Fox News ratings with his smart, astute, downright stunning rants. Here's a reprint of the absolute best one, from Thursday, October 19, 2006. ************************* Published on Thursday, October 19, 2006 by http://www.msnbc.msn.com MSNBC Interactive 'Beginning of the End of America' Olbermann Addresses the Military Commissions Act in a Special Comment by Keith Olbermann We have lived as if in a trance. We have lived as people in fear. And now our rights and our freedoms in peril and we slowly awake to learn that we have been afraid of the wrong thing. Therefore, tonight have we truly become the inheritors of our American legacy. For, on this first full day that the Military Commissions Act is in force, we now face what our ancestors faced, at other times of exaggerated crisis and melodramatic fear-mongering: A government more dangerous to our liberty, than is the enemy it claims to protect us from. We have been here before, and we have been here before led by men better and wiser and nobler than George W. Bush. We have been here when President John Adams insisted that the Alien and Sedition Acts were necessary to save American lives, only to watch him use those acts to jail newspaper editors. American newspaper editors, in American jails, for things they wrote about America. We have been here when President Woodrow Wilson insisted that the Espionage Act was necessary to save American lives, only to watch him use that Act to prosecute 2,000 Americans, especially those he disparaged as "Hyphenated Americans," most of whom were guilty only of advocating peace in a time of war. American public speakers, in American jails, for things they said about America. And we have been here when President Franklin D. Roosevelt insisted that Executive Order 9066 was necessary to save American lives, only to watch him use that order to imprison and pauperize 110,000 Americans while his man in charge, General DeWitt, told Congress: "It makes no difference whether he is an American citizen, he is still a Japanese." American citizens, in American camps, for something they neither wrote nor said nor did, but for the choices they or their ancestors had made about coming to America. Each of these actions was undertaken for the most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons. And each was a betrayal of that for which the president who advocated them claimed to be fighting. Adams and his party were swept from office, and the Alien and Sedition Acts erased. Many of the very people Wilson silenced survived him, and one of them even ran to succeed him, and got 900,000 votes, though his presidential campaign was conducted entirely from his jail cell.
And Roosevelt's internment of the Japanese was not merely the worst blight on his record, but it would necessitate a formal apology from the government of the United States to the citizens of the United States whose lives it ruined.
The most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons.
In times of fright, we have been only human.
We have let Roosevelt's "fear of fear itself" overtake us.
We have listened to the little voice inside that has said, "the wolf is at the door; this will be temporary; this will be precise; this too shall pass."
We have accepted that the only way to stop the terrorists is to let the government become just a little bit like the terrorists.
Just the way we once accepted that the only way to stop the Soviets was to let the government become just a little bit like the Soviets.
Or substitute the Japanese.
Or the Germans.
Or the Socialists.
Or the Anarchists.
Or the Immigrants.
Or the British.
Or the Aliens.
The most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons.
And, always, always wrong.
With the distance of history, the questions will be narrowed and few: Did this generation of Americans take the threat seriously, and did we do what it takes to defeat that threat?
Wise words.
And ironic ones, Mr. Bush.
Your own, of course, yesterday, in signing the Military Commissions Act.
You spoke so much more than you know, Sir.
Sadly, of course, the distance of history will recognize that the threat this generation of Americans needed to take seriously was you.
We have a long and painful history of ignoring the prophecy attributed to Benjamin Franklin that ,those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
But even within this history we have not before codified the poisoning of habeas corpus, that wellspring of protection from which all essential liberties flow.
You, sir, have now befouled that spring.
You, sir, have now given us chaos and called it order.
You, sir, have now imposed subjugation and called it freedom.
For the most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons.
And, again, Mr. Bush, all of them, wrong.
We have handed a blank check drawn against our freedom to a man who has said it is unacceptable to compare anything this country has ever done to anything the terrorists have ever done.
We have handed a blank check drawn against our freedom to a man who has insisted again that "the United States does not torture. It's against our laws and it's against our values" and who has said it with a straight face while the pictures from Abu Ghraib Prison and the stories of Waterboarding figuratively fade in and out, around him.
We have handed a blank check drawn against our freedom to a man who may now, if he so decides, declare not merely any non-American citizens "unlawful enemy combatants" and ship them somewhere, anywhere -- but may now, if he so decides, declare you an "unlawful enemy combatant" and ship you somewhere - anywhere.
And if you think this hyperbole or hysteria, ask the newspaper editors when John Adams was president or the pacifists when Woodrow Wilson was president or the Japanese at Manzanar when Franklin Roosevelt was president.
And if you somehow think habeas corpus has not been suspended for American citizens but only for everybody else, ask yourself this: If you are pulled off the street tomorrow, and they call you an alien or an undocumented immigrant or an "unlawful enemy combatant," exactly how are you going to convince them to give you a court hearing to prove you are not? Do you think this attorney general is going to help you?
This President now has his blank check.
He lied to get it.
He lied as he received it.
Is there any reason to even hope he has not lied about how he intends to use it nor who he intends to use it against?
"These military commissions will provide a fair trial," you told us yesterday, Mr. Bush, "in which the accused are presumed innocent, have access to an attorney and can hear all the evidence against them."
"Presumed innocent," Mr. Bush?
The very piece of paper you signed as you said that, allows for the detainees to be abused up to the point just before they sustain "serious mental and physical trauma" in the hope of getting them to incriminate themselves, and may no longer even invoke The Geneva Conventions in their own defense.
"Access to an attorney," Mr. Bush?
Lieutenant Commander Charles Swift said on this program, Sir, and to the Supreme Court, that he was only granted access to his detainee defendant on the promise that the detainee would plead guilty.
"Hearing all the evidence," Mr. Bush?
The Military Commissions Act specifically permits the introduction of classified evidence not made available to the defense.
Your words are lies, Sir.
They are lies that imperil us all.
"One of the terrorists believed to have planned the 9/11 attacks" you told us yesterday, "said he hoped the attacks would be the beginning of the end of America."
That terrorist, sir, could only hope.
Not his actions, nor the actions of a ceaseless line of terrorists (real or imagined), could measure up to what you have wrought.
Habeas corpus? Gone.
The Geneva Conventions? Optional.
The moral force we shined outwards to the world as an eternal beacon, and inwards at ourselves as an eternal protection? Snuffed out.
These things you have done, Mr. Bush, they would be "the beginning of the end of America."
And did it even occur to you once, sir, somewhere amidst those eight separate, gruesome, intentional, terroristic invocations of the horrors of 9/11 -- that with only a little further shift in this world we now know, just a touch more repudiation of all of that for which our patriots died --- did it ever occur to you once that in just 27 months and two days from now when you leave office, some irresponsible future president and a "competent tribunal" of lackeys would be entitled, by the actions of your own hand, to declare the status of "unlawful enemy combatant" for -- and convene a Military Commission to try -- not John Walker Lindh, but George Walker Bush?
For the most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons.
And doubtless, Sir, all of them, as always, wrong.
© 2006 MSNBC Interactive
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's interesting to live at least part of your life in plain sight. When I've written I've been pretty straightforward, warts and all. I have no internal auditing system and quite like that about myself. I've let you know me. But I've been hiding...
The last few months, I've been so wrapped up in getting the jagged pieces of my life to fit smoothly together again, I haven't even thought about sharing any part of myself. The severely broken heart last summer, the grueling custody battle and subsequent exhiliarating win, the ups and downs of my business, the (very personal) failure of our criminal system, the disappointment in the outright breakdown, no, total corruption, of our political system, and on and on. It's been exhausting enough dealing with this life's vagueries internally, no less externally. But of late, I'm seeing life very differently, and really liking what I see. So I'm back, and, again, you're stuck with me.
I try to smile before I open my eyes every day. I struggle, most days successfully, to ignore the bruises from all the kicks I've taken while down. I've never thought of myself as an optimist, per se, but realise I am in the purest sense of the word. Because, though things may not always go well, or even just okay, I seem to constantly strive for, and continue to hope that, they will. And that's no mean feat.
My son, who's now four-and-a-half, has a lot to do with it. In March, when I first won my custody fight and began having him live with me almost half the time, it was tough on us both. After learning so little about each other in the first few years of his life, we began feeling our way through the strange minefield of father-son interaction surprisingly easily. The evolution of our relationship has been incredibly rapid, and we've achieved the gleeful dynamics of actually knowing each other. It's been emotionally freeing, and life affirming, for me. We laugh a lot, his laugh being perhaps the greatest drug I've ever had. And my two beautiful, wonderful daughters have each really come into their own, and become really whole people, and that just makes me kvell, (a Yiddish word, which very loosely translated, means "swell, or burst, with pride"). In these respects I am a very wealthy man.
As a freestanding individual, though, I've long known there was something missing, something I had a brief glimpse of last year for the first time in my life, which only made it that much harder to recover when it so quickly vanished. Yet even in the face of that loss, I remained grateful for the experience, and have stayed friendly with, and cherished the friendship of, the wonderful person who gave it to me. I now realise that, too, makes me an optimist. And optimism evidently has it's rewards.
I'm reaping those rewards now. By not having allowed that part of myself to shut down, I've recently been incredibly fortunate enough to have reconnected with a very old friend, someone I'd long admired for more valid reasons than I could even begin to list. It turns out the intervening years have put us in this amazing place where it seems to take no effort for us to be great now, and no limit to how great we will become. An absolutely unexpected blessing of the highest order.
So this is optimism? I could really get used to this..... |
|
|
|
|
|
Back on March 27, 2006 I wrote a RAVE about a local production of Arthur Miller's timeless classic, DEATH OF A SALESMAN. I noticed in this morning's paper it's re-opening, in the larger venue at Pacific Resident Theatre complex, 703 Venice Blvd, Venice, CA. It'll run through July 23rd. If you have even a passing interest in the classics - in fact, especially if you don't - don't miss this production. All the same actors and director are involved. It's simply stunning, and brilliant. Here's a reprint of my review:
" My beautiful dear friend, Lesley, (an awesome playwright herself), took me Saturday night to see the Venice-based Pacific Resident Theatre's equity-waiver production of Arthur Miller's enduring "Death Of A Salesman". For those who don't know, equity waiver means under 99 seats, and verrrry small spaces. Spaces so small the actors use the aisles to come and go, change scenery as they're delivering lines, and basically perform so close to the audience you can see and feel and hear every flaw. Fortunately, this production had almost none. Intelligently and ably directed by Elina de Santos, even the smallest of characters were performed incredibly by this talented troupe, proving again there are no small roles, only small actors. The four leads - Richard Fancy as patriarch, lifelong-struggling bullshitter Willie Loman, Sharron Shayne as long, almost-silently suffering matriarch Linda, and David Clayberg and Greg Vignolle as wildly different but strangely similar sons Hap and Biff, respectively - were perfectly cast and performed in what must have been Miller's vision of these people. (Unlike, in my opinion, Dustin Hoffman, who drew raves for this role, in heavy age-makeup, but was way too young for it when he did it a few years ago with not enough life under his belt). What really struck me about this performance, and it's very much to de Santos's credit this was so apparent, was the undiminishing effects of Miller's ideas. Miller could be Shakespearian in his writing and this play is the perfect example of material that should, and will, be read or at least seen, in perpetuity. A morality play with a timeless message. My only regret is the run has ended so you can't go see this production. Read it. " [Again, this review is from March...it's re-opened now until 7/23]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I met my old lover On the street last night She seemed so glad to see me I just smiled...... Still crazy after all these years
I did. I was with the boy, and we'd just finished getting tanked up on warm cocoa and lewd triple chocolate cake at the Bean. We'd walked the half mile from my place into town, (no small feat for a 4 year old), to test our new "Crocs", those great, light, soft flexible clogs. His are bright orange, his favorite color. Mine are beige, simply because I didn't have the balls, no matter how much he implored me, to get mine to match. Me. In plastic orange clogs. The mental image alone makes me laugh. And incredible negotiator that he is, he made me promise that the next ones we get, he'll get beige and I orange. So we'll have two matching pairs. Hope his memory's not as good as his bargaining skills....
But I digress. So, we ran into her. The one I still have massive feelings for after nearly a year. What a rush of mixed emotions. I do nothing half-assed anymore, that's for damned sure. Since I never really knew how to fall in love before her, I certainly can't figure how to fall out. Strange and bizarre. It's great and horrible seeing her, at once. Her smile, the thing that hooked me and "did it" for me from the beginning, still does, and she always wears the biggest one when she sees me. Go figure. I can't. But I get to the point pretty often where I think I'm moving forward, and wham. Not exactly a setback, but a sidetracking. And the woman I'm seeing, who I like a lot and clearly think warmly of a good deal of the time, vanishes from the braincells. What is the matter with me? Don't answer, I know.......
Still crazy......
*********************************************
We saw the brilliant "CARS" Friday, and that adjective couldn't be more appropos. In sound, color, script, execution, production, voicing, every aspect of this movie was just that - brilliant. His mom and I are getting along pretty well, as separate parents go, so we took him together, and it's a real tossup who enjoyed it more; Cole, mom or me.
If you'd heard Paul Newman, Owen Wilson, Bonnie Hunt, Cheech Marin, Tony Shaloub, Michael Keaton, Bob Costas, hell, even Larry "The Cable Guy", were doing a film together, you'd go, right? Well, GO!! You don't need a kid for this animated film, either, it's that good. And it's no cartoon. It is a film in every sense of the word. The voicing is fantastic, the tale an old fashioned finding-yourself-and-finding-love story. But the real star is the animation. I have simply never seen rendering so pure and real that I lost all sense of the unreality of it so early into it. Just stunning. This will easily be Pixar/Disney's highest grosser long range. I couldn't recommend it more highly!! (And the added treat of a phenomenal musical short before the main feature, digitally rendered and mastered so purely you have to see it in a new theater that has the 16-track surround sound, was a terrific bonus. So go early). ********************************************
After CARS on Friday, Saturday night I floundered for something for the boy and I to watch. We've run through my large personal collection (most more than twice) already so we made the short jaunt to Blockbuster, a trip which wasn't pretty. He wanted The Incredibles yet again, which is great, but after 12 viewings I just couldn't bring myself to watch, even for him. Which produced a major meltdown. He ranted, yelled, and finally cried, and everyone else there must've thought me the worst Dad ever. But there, next to what he wanted, was a film my other 2 kids just adored. And ranks in my top ten of all time. So I proceeded to try and talk him into it, which made the meltdown worse. I am dad, though, and I prevailed, rented it, and carried the boy, kicking and screaming, to the car for the short drive home.
He calmed down enough to go into Whole Foods for treats to have while watching the movie, and the turnaround began. I ran into a few friends and asked each to tell him what they thought of a movie that has candy at it's core. And each told him it was their favorite and he'd love it, and gave him different, but perfect, reasons. By the time we bought our own Reese's Pieces, and left the store, he was happy, and truly anxious.
Of course, by now you know it's ET:The ExtraTerrestrial. I rented the 20th Anniversary Edition, which is digitally remastered beautifully, and included about 12 minutes of added scenes. I don't know how the original did without them, but this version is an even better film than I remembered. And he was awed, and sublimely happy. And that's the best recommendation you can get, 'cause this kid's a movie freak. So whether you have young kids to share it with or not, I highly recommend you see this film again. Because it has everything a film should, and then some, and is simply one of the finest stories ever told. And really holds up. |
|
|
|
|
|
Family is everything. It's why we live, breathe, eat, exist....... And nothing's better than discovering someone in yours has real, true talent.
My 19 y/o daughter is an amazing kid: sweet, pretty, smart, savvy, but she's struggled her whole life to really find herself. I've raised her completely alone from infancy, and she's had no relations with her mother, at all, since she was 8. So the struggle was understandable. She had me as her father and no mother. Imagine...
She's always had a "nose" for knowing what's coming years before it arrives. Music, fashion, trends...even at 10 she was ahead of the curve, and has a great eye for the visual. To that end, she's recently taken up photography as an outlet, going so far as majoring in it at college. And, man, has she hit her stride and found her life's calling. It is a remarkable thing to see. She's now got a lab in her apartment and the entire process seems to really fit her perfectly as the latest crop of pics, shot for her "final" this semester, are truly spectacular. I was so filled with wonderment, pride and glee when I saw them I was speechless. Me...
For me, it really put a cool new spin on watching Chelsea develop.....and I couldn't be happier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not a big fan of traditional pop music...never have been, even when I earned a living playing it. I like alternative rock, r&b, soul, classic rock, acoustic/emo (does anyone call it "folk" anymore?), world music, reggae, ska, jazz, even classical....you get the idea. My tastes are wide and varied so I've always felt anything liked by so many millions of people would include enough tasteless folks that I couldn't abide it.
But I heard a real gem on the radio the other day, which moved me to goosebumps, (am I a girliemon?!?!?!?), so I came home and downloaded, (LOVE my pod, and iTunes), UNWRITTEN by Natasha Bedingfield. Now it is pop, so I should've just downloaded the one song, (which if you're not a pop fan, is what you should do). The album is pretty okay, even by my standards, and if you like light, airy, meaningless and danceable you will definitely like the entire CD. I am not wild about it. But the replay button on my iPod has sure been getting a workout for the title track.
Words, production values, music, execution....this song kicks ass and I imagine, (as I'm a latecomer - this was released in August 2005), this song is already on a bazillion-plus alarm/clock radios for that inspirational wake up buzz. Because you just can't help being elated by it. It is truly uplifting.
And there's a two line passage right in the middle that is catch-your-breath stunning. It's sung by what sounds like a thousand voice choir reminiscent of the Edwin Hawkins Singers, (am I dating myself?), that the late, great Luther Vandross, and so many other brilliant producers/artists, used almost to excess a few years back. I hope Ms. Bedingfield goes forward with more of this style and less of the easier stuff, because, for a pretty, slight, white British girl, she will definitely make a name for herself in true soul/inspirational music.
I defy you to not be moved. |
|
|
|
|
|
Quick RANT - GODADDY SUCKS. Do not be fooled or taken in by their come-ons. Get your services elsewhere. Nothing works the way they promise, except of course for their billing department. I apologise for the lost posts and failed subscriber notifications, BUT IT'S NOT MY FAULT. GODADDY SUCKS.
***************************
When business is bad, life can suck. Men especially, (not to be sexist, I swear), seem to measure themselves by their success at it. And while I've never been a real subscriber to that theory, even though my reasons for suffering professionally couldn't have been more legitimate, (my custody fight was sucking me dry physically, emotionally and financially), I still felt stung.
When business is good, so can life be. I have almost always worked for myself, and worked hard at intertwining my family and work. It has truly been a fun ride for us all, and that's great. Well, business is good, again, and unfortunately time has gotten tight. And you, dear readers, have paid the most by my lack of posts. (No ego, I swear. I've gotten a lot of "where are you?" emails). But I should be entrenched in my new offices in the next 2 weeks, with assistants, (something I've never had before, but it's that busy....gonna have to learn to delegate responsibility - yikes), and that will free me to do at least twice-a-week posts again. I'll be back out at screenings, shows and events, hearing facts and rumors, (both of which I'll gleefully spread), and having fun again in an industry with which I have always had a love/hate/but-mostly-love relationship. And I will share ALL of that with you. In Rants and Raves. (And personally, I like the Rants a whole lot more, they're much more fun to write....). So a little more patience will definitely be worth your while. Swear.
********************************
Every year I truly enjoy something I will share with you today (and thanks, Rachael B. for getting them to me early).... Drumroll, please....
This year's Darwin Awards - the annual honor given to the person who improved the "gene pool" the most by killing themselves in the most extraordinarily stupid way. As always, competition this year has been keen. And the candidates this year are ....
In Detroit, a 41-year-old man got stuck and drowned in two feet of water after squeezing head first through an 18-inch-wide sewer grate to retrieve his car keys.
A 49-year-old San Francisco stockbroker, who "totally zoned when he ran," accidentally jogged off a 100-foot-high cliff on his daily run.
Buxton, NC: A man died on a beach when an 8-foot-deep hole he had dug into the sand caved in as he sat inside it. Beach-goers said Daniel Jones, 21, dug the hole for fun, or protection from the wind, and had been sitting in a beach chair at the bottom Thursday afternoon when it collapsed, burying him beneath 5 feet of sand. People on the beach on the outer banks, used their hands and shovels, trying to claw their way to Jones, a resident of Woodbridge, VA, but could not reach him. It took rescue workers using heavy equipment almost an hour to free him while about 200 people looked on. Jones was pronounced dead at a hospital.
Santiago Alvarado, 24, was killed in Lompoc, CA, as he fell face-first through the ceiling of a bicycle shop he was burglarizing. Death was caused when the long flashlight he had placed in his mouth, to keep his hands free, rammed into the base of his skull as he hit the floor.
Sylvester Briddell, Jr., 26, was killed in Selbyville, Del, as he won a bet with friends who said he would not put a revolver loaded with four bullets into his mouth and pull the trigger.
HONORABLE MENTION: Paul Stiller, 47, was hospitalized in Andover township, NJ, and his wife Bonnie was also injured, when a quarter-stick of dynamite blew up in their car. While driving around 2 AM, the bored couple lit the dynamite and tried to toss it out the window to see what would happen, but apparently failed to notice the window was closed.
RUNNER UP: Kerry Bingham, of Tacoma, WA, had been drinking with several friends when one of them said they knew a person who had bungee-jumped from the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in the middle of traffic. The conversation grew more heated and at least 10 men trooped along the walkway of the bridge at 4:30 AM. Upon arrival at the midpoint of the bridge they discovered that no one had brought a bungee rope. Bingham, who had continued drinking, volunteered and pointed out that a coil of lineman's cable lay nearby. One end of the cable was secured around Bingham's leg and the other end was tied to the bridge. His fall lasted 40 feet before the cable tightened and tore his foot off at the ankle. He miraculously survived his fall into the icy river water and was rescued by two nearby fishermen. "All I can say " said Bingham, "is that God was watching out for me on that night. There's just no other explanation for it." Bingham's foot was never located.
AND THE WINNER: Overzealous zookeeper Friedrich Riesfeldt (Paderborn, Germany) fed his constipated elephant Stefan 22 doses of animal laxative and more than a bushel of berries, figs and prunes before the plugged-up pachyderm finally let it fly, and suffocated the keeper under 200 pounds of poop! investigators say ill-fated Friedrich, 46, was attempting to give the ailing elephant an olive oil enema when the relieved beast unloaded on him. "The sheer force of the elephant's unexpected defecation knocked Mr. Riesfeldt to the ground, where he struck his head on a rock and lay unconscious as the elephant continued to evacuate his bowels on top of him" said flabbergasted Paderborn police detective Erik Dern. With no one there to help him, he lay under all that dung for at least an hour before a watchman came along, and during that time he suffocated. It seems to be just one of those freak accidents that proves that "Shit does in fact happen!"
Hope you laughed....next post will not be so funny....I actually PAID to see "M:I:III"....what the fuck is wrong with me? (now, be nice....) |
|
|
|
|
|
So, this morning I wake up to quite a situation. In the last two months I've met with 4 investment groups and two "angels" in the quest to ramp up my business. All agreed the business plan is a great one, and includes 3 web-based, and 2 "realtime", concerns. Independent consultants have projected profit within 1 year. And by today's standards I'm looking for a pittance. Seriously.
But, even after getting "firm" commitments from 2 of the groups and 1 of the angels, not one damn thing has happened. And because of those assurances I've continued to spend what I can hardly afford to keep the effort going, leaving me pretty much out in the cold. And as I look around and speak to friends and family, this seems really par for the course of life in 2006. When did this happen?
For most of my life, giving one's word, commitment, assurance, etc., meant something. To me, as I learned early and well from my father, my word has always been my bond. I never say I will if I only might, (with the exception being when I make a promise evidently foolishly based on someone else's promise to me). So why is that so hard for everyone? Is life so iffy for people these days that an assurance really isn't?
Our president and government do it, (think WMDs, Iraq, gas prices) as do our corporate leaders, (think Enron and Adelphia). And when they push that first domino down, the rest can't help but fall. Lives are affected, and ultimately, ruined by these acts, sometimes on a really grand scale. Thousands of lives have been lost in a lie-based war. Families left grieving by a government that gave it's word. Thousands of lives were turned upside down by the Enron failure alone. People's pensions, homes, cars all lost. The trickle down from those directly affected, to their families, stunning. Clothing, food, basic neccesities, tuitons....all wiped out. Lifetimes of hopes and dreams dashed by a very few men's greed, and need to pretend to be a standing domino while in reality in mid-fall. I try and think of these people, the victims, when my situation looks bleakest, but it doesn't help much. We're all tied together by human frailties these days, it seems. Commonality making the vast majority suffer while the few hem and haw. I'm just one small domino near the bottom. If it affects me this way, what happens to those higher, and lower, on the chain? I'm beyond perplexed as to why we all can't just find a way to be who we say we are or will be, and do what we say we will. I'm really dismayed.
Anybody want to invest in a great business? Seems my success historically, and the belief in myself and what I'm trying to accomplish, should be worth something. If not with, (or for), me, at least say what you'll do and then do it for someone. It'll make us all better. |
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, I took some serious heat for the last post. Male and female friends alike all weighed in, and not necessarily nicely. Oh well, I've warned you many times - I write what I feel and think, and more often than not, throw caution (and tact) to the wind. IyamwhatIyam. Akakakakak.
********************************************
David Kelley has got to be the most prolific television writer ever. He's not always great, but he sure puts out. (And if I was married to Michele Feiffer.........). Ally McBeal and Boston Public were formerly my 2 favorite Kelley shows, but, damn, BOSTON LEGAL is amazing. The scripts are incredible, relevant, current, smart, and always funny, laced with irony. But the real coup here is the casting. William Shatner, Candace Bergen, Renee Aubergenois, James Spader.....all with the roles of their lives. Seriously. Tom Selleck recently did a fantastic arc, as Bergen's ex. Adam Arkin as a DA, too. And the supporting cast is beyond supportive. Mostly, though, every scene between Shatner and Spader is like watching an actor's exercise in perfection. I can't recall ever seeing two actors so perfectly matched. BIG RAVE.
************************************************
MSNBC's "Countdown with Keith Olberman" still ranks as my favorite reason for owning a TV. If you haven't paid attention to my previous raves about this show, start now. With all the scandals going on, and the ludicrous state of politics, and American life in general, this guy's point of view is remarkable. And I can't stress how seamlessly he glides between the uber-intelligencia and the under-achievers. He's ridiculously smart in a very relating-to-the-common-man way. And he's funny as hell. HUGE RAVE.
************************************************
Ok. I admit, for the last few weeks I've been lost in LOST. For a show that started out last year so smart and so non-linear, I've been disappointed that the writer/producers started to take themselves and their press way too seriously. Last night brought home why this show's so good, though. The meat of the show was terrific, and the end a total shock. Good to see a show pullback so successfully before the shark got jumped. BIG RAVE.
**************************************************
Is there a more creative half hour on TV than THE SIMPSONS? The show's just been renewed for 2 more years and there's a movie in the works for release next summer. I know there's a few of you reading this thinking, what a stupid show. Doh! You couldn't be more wrong, and if you view it as a cartoon, you've missed the point entirely. They're more human than you or I could ever hope to be. BIG RAVE.
**************************************************
Ok. So more people watch American Idol every time it airs than have died in all wars in modern history combined. And the analogy was intentional. What the hell is it about this juggernaut? Sorry, I don't get it. I can't name one former Idol loser, and aside from last year's Kelly Clarkson, the only winners are those three "judges" and the munchkin who hosts the show. I have watched a few times the last few weeks because I was going to write a piece on it, but I just can't muster the inanity to watch even one more minute. So this is the piece. BIG RAZZ.
More to come............
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'll preface this by saying while it seems like I'm "lumping" all men and all women into camps, I do not believe that's always the case. But it is enough of the time for me to vent this way. And it did happen to me this way, twice, so it's my perspective. Although, from the emails and calls I've gotten already, I do seem to personally know a lot of women who played it, if not completely honest, as straight as they could. A dear friend's lawyer called her son's beating the "unfortunate misunderstanding" and her beating "one unfortuntate ugly incident". So it does go both ways, just not as often as it should.
When I posted my intent to write a piece about what Alec Baldwin, Charlie Sheen, Me, and thousands of other men had in common, the most beautiful event planner in LA, my friend Barbara, guessed the topic, and emailed me to be cautious: "you never know what goes on in private". So I will be. But I can say with absolute honesty, clarity and certainty what I personally experienced. And my guess is for those two celebs, and many more celebs and civilians of the male persuasion, it's not a whole lot different.
I've written before about the insanity, and risks, of living and loving so publicly, (scroll down to "Britney to Justin to Cameron..."). I'll give ya that the ridiculousness of it does occasionally border on the sublime. But just as, (if not more), often, the subhuman. To wit: imagine how frustrated you'd be, after being promised things would stay friendly and "clean", to see details of the most nasty, misleading, exaggerated and/or false filings on every "entertainment" show on the air; then hearing the frustrated voicemails you left, after being falsely (or at least exaggeratedly) accused of these horrible acts, on the morning news...(and don't you think she let that stuff out to lessen the impact of those pics of her on the balcony with Richie? It worked didn't it?)...at least I didn't have to go through that. But believe me, not having them aired publicly doesn't lessen their impact.
Whether it's the women involved, or their lawyers, (so ultimately, again, the women, as lawyers work for them not vice versa), the majority of the distaff half of these court equations, be said battles custody, divorce, or both, seem to think they have a pass to invent stories that fit the needs of their cases; and not just a pass, but usually the encouragement of these s.o.b.s with JDs. Now, heeding Barbara's advice will be easy. Because while I know that publicly Kim is accusing Alec, and Denise Charlie, of heinous acts to which I was not witness, I personally suffered a similar unjust fate and can tell you that first person.
The courts will accept whatever is filed. That's their job. Then it's the mediator/evaluator/commissioner's job to sift through the animus and figure out what's real and what's not. In three years of my custody fight I sat through a lot of other cases while waiting for mine to be called, and I can tell you there wasn't one single case that had the husband/father making the initial accusations. And it never ceased to amaze me what gets said in these papers. Even guys like me, who were the ones who filed, (the plaintiffs), to a man, took the high road, at least in their first filings. Then, if your lawyer convinces you of the need to "compete" you, too, get nasty. I was lucky that my lawyer, (the amazing Rita Kahlenberg, Esq.), stood with me in truth and never once encouraged me to, or insisted I, make false or exaggerated claims for the benefit of my case. As she loved to point out, I didn't have to. My son's mother's claims were so unfounded, outrageous, and plain out fabricated, that the truth did eventually win, although at the cost of my involvement in the first four years of his life. I was awarded joint legal custody, and a really reasonable physical custody schedule. So I'm making up for lost time now, and I have the power to say no to his mom's crazy demands and whims, finally.
I doubt that'll be the case with Alec or Charlie, though, because they're being played. And rather than let their (somewhat) good names be dragged through the mud, I can almost guarantee you they'll quietly settle for some shitty custody plan. Their careers are at stake, in an industry that will penalise them for being less than the men they claim to be. Even if their claims are just. And they likely are, moreso than Kim and Denise are portraying. But Kim and Denise are playing the victims and victims are far more sympathetic. Forget that Kim's accusations are being discredited by almost everyone close to her, even some of her own family. And credit Alec for staying relatively strong and silent and not levelling false claims, or even the true ones, against her publicly. (I know someone involved in his case and he, like me, insisted his lawyers stick to the high road). Forget that Denise, while making her terrible claims, is very publicly flaunting her own fooling around with her former best friend's very recent ex-husband. And credit Charlie for keeping his mouth shut about the entire case, but mostly that part of it. Because he certainly could accuse her of being a lowlife, and not just for being a liar/exaggerator but a homewrecker. It would seem an easy jump to say she'd been fooling around with him all along, or was the reason he and Heather broke up. Ya just never know, but it would surely be believed by some. And broadcast, because true, half-true, or false makes no difference to Access Hollywood. It's the story that counts.
My son's mother pulled a lot of similar, horrible crap, made a lot of false claims, was inflexible in letting me spend time with my son, pitted some of my own family against me, and generally drove me into emotional, (and financial), bankruptcy. She had a boyfriend, they had a "Grand Plan" and were convinced I'd walk away, and they'd live happily-ever-after on the east coast. They couldn't have been more determined to make that happen at any cost. And all the while did what she pleased, travelled at will, made unilateral decisions in our son's interest, and made sure our son had little regard for me. But after three years of postponements and maneuvering, mostly by her scumbag attorneys, we finally had a trial because I wouldn't back down from what was right, just and truthful. And when she finally had the chance to rule, the commissioner ruled almost 100% in my favor. And all his mother could say was "I was just doing what I truly believed was best for our son". Which even the commissioner clearly knew was bullshit, and said as much in her filing. But the real benefit for me wasn't a lawyer who made me stick to my guns, which were loaded with truth, but the lack of having to defend myself against public airing of the sordidness of it all. And thus the undue influence of public opinion. So pity those involved in Alec v. Kim and Charlie v. Denise. But mostly pity the kids, because ultimately it's about them, and they'll suffer the most.
I feel for these guys. And the millions like them who have to go through this whether they're famous, infamous, or just regular guys. I can because I've been one of them. Twice. The courts, especially in custody disputes, are horrifically biased towards mothers, and in this day and age, that's just plain wrong. Men make great parents and every man I know who wants to be involved with his children does as good a job, or better, than his wife or ex. Even in families that are together, men have stepped up and parent with the best of them. Change diapers, feed kids, clothe them, drive carpools, coach sports, hold hands, fix booboos, play with dolls with their daughters as well as they play baseball with their sons, and yet that bias, at the end, still exists.
But men rarely get to play victims as well as women, if at all. And that's the worst injustice in the system, because when all is said and done, the supposed victims are more often than not the victimizers. Good luck Alec and Charlie. Stick to your guns. Sometimes, it works out. |
|
|
|
|
| | |